Commentary for Bava Kamma 34:4
אי הכי הא מבעי ליה למיתני ברישא האי דאתיא ליה מדרשא חביבא ליה
But according to this, the subsequent Mishnah stating, 'Tooth is <i>Mu'ad</i> … Any animal is <i>Mu'ad</i> …'<span class="x" onmousemove="('comment',' [Infra 19b. ');"><sup>4</sup></span>
Tosafot on Bava Kamma
It seems that if a person throws a rock or arrow towards a vessel and another person comes along and shatters the vessel before the projectile strikes it, certainly the one who shattered the vessel (and not the one who threw the rock) is liable. In this instance we do not apply the rationale of “the second one broke the vessel.” simple logic call for us to distinguish between throwing a rock (toward a vessel) and throwing the vessel itself.
Ask RabbiBookmarkShareCopy